Sunday, November 29, 2009

The car is upside-down. The wheels are still spinning.

My dad told me a story about a guy he knew either in college or in dental school. The story has never left me. It is indelible.

Decades ago, on a desolate night near Wendover, Utah, this guy my dad knew came upon a single-car accident. The car was on its top. The wheels were still spinning, probably slowly. But the man made a point to tell my dad that the wheels were still spinning.

Picture yourself in that car. You might have been traveling to see relatives. Or to a job interview. Or to your honeymoon. A tire blows. You fight for control. Control does not come. The dotted line is a blur, the steering wheel has a mind of its own, and you are full of panic while your passengers are suddenly awake, screaming at an ear-piercing volume. And suddenly the car tilts and lifts and the steering wheel no longer fights against you. Bangs and metal screeches fill every space inside the car. Shattered glass glistens, suspended in front of you, the light from the speedometer and fuel gauge showing the millions of tiny shards. Your head is knocked from side to side. Your arms will not honor your instincts to bring them in close to your sides, to protect you; they crack and slam against the inside of your door and the car's ceiling. It lasts all too long--the violence of the rolling car. You have no idea how many times it's rolled. You just want it to end.

And then it's over. You're not sure how long the car has been still. There are a few odd noises still, here and there. You can tell you're upside-down. You think of them, the passengers in your vehicle. You think you can hear breathing, but you're not sure. Your ears are ringing. It's dark. No sign of light. It's very late and your thoughts turn to hospitals, nurses, people rushing around in white coats. They would know what you need. They would know what your family or friends need. All you want right now is to hear a siren, to see flashing red light bouncing off your surroundings. You hear something. A car. You don't hear a siren or see any red light, but it's a car. It's slowing down. You feel like the 74 prayers you've said during the past minute--or has it been hours?--have been answered. Someone has found you. You can hear it. The car is slowing. Slowing still.

They see us.

If they were any closer, with the windows down, they could practically hear you whisper a plea for help. The car that slowed down is picking up speed. You can tell because the tires are moving faster on the pavement, making cracking and popping noises as they encounter the small rocks that your accident has spewed across the freeway lane near the shoulder. The only thing worse than your physical pain right now is the confusion and despair that set in.

They saw us. They are gone.

Now I don't know how the accident happened. But I imagine it could have been like that. Perhaps no one survived even the first few seconds of the crash. Maybe they made it. But the end of the story is true. That is what happened. The man my dad knew came upon the upside-down car, its wheels still spinning. And he drove away. Our man did not want to get involved, apparently, for whatever reason.

Last night on patrol we got word of an incident that reminded me of this story. A driver was southbound on the interstate and got a flat tire. A citizen pulled over to help her and noticed she had two children with her. Afterward, the citizen called 9-1-1 to report that during the process of changing the tire, the woman who got the flat tire actually pulled out some pot and started smoking it. After getting back on the road, she was driving a bit recklessly at a very high speed. The citizen-caller tried to follow her while he was on the phone with the emergency dispatcher, but the woman was going too fast and he could not keep tabs on where she was going. Southbound: that was all we knew. Another deputy and a highway patrol trooper started looking for her. Because they got a late start in their pursuit they could not catch up to her.

We headed to the interstate and saw a car heading south at a high speed. We crossed the median and caught up to the car and discovered it had the same plates that the citizen-caller had described. We watched closely for 'probable cause,' driving behavior that would warrant pulling someone over and testing for DUI. The driver noticed us and began to slow down. We followed until she went past the county line. We only had a few miles of jurisdiction, and the driving behavior was not quite erratic enough. We were done. The highway patrol trooper had to take over from that point. The driver pulled off the freeway because our pursuit was obvious, and headed straight to a motel. And that's the last I know of it.

The unfortunate thing was that we could have pulled the driver over instantly if the citizen-caller had been willing to sign a document detailing what he had seen when she allegedly smoked marijuana, got back into a car with two kids in it and drove recklessly down the interstate. But he would not. I guess he did not want to get involved beyond making a phone call.

The disappointment was not that we did not get to pull her over, or arrest her for DUI. The issue was the kids in the car. And the kids and people in the cars around her on the freeway. That was the point.

I don't know that I'd be comfortable with myself ever again if I'd been the one who drove away from that accident near Wendover. And if that driver from last night had crashed, or caused someone else to crash, I wonder what that citizen-caller would have thought if he'd known that we could have stopped her instantly if he'd been willing to get more involved by signing a complaint.

It's not always going to be comfortable to do the right thing. But what about the comfort that comes after you do the right thing?

Friday, November 20, 2009

Decisions

How many times have I done something that, afterward, I have completely regretted? I think most people would do at least a few things differently if they could go back in time.

We have a kid here in Helena who just turned 18. When he was 17, back in late Spring or early Summer, he was at a party. He was drinking. Something happened with some text messages, I think, and he ended up picking a fight with some kids. He met them near a neighborhood in town, telling them he was not going to "fight fair." Then he pulled out a handgun and shot all three of them. He killed one of them and severely wounded the other two.

So this kid entered a plea a few days ago. He pleaded guilty in a courtroom where his family, as well as the families of his victims, watched and listened. Wearing the token orange jumpsuit, he sat at a table with two attorneys. He looked young. His brown hair was short and neat. He seemed like a regular, decent teenager. His glasses made him look smart, which, according to how his friends have described him, is very much the case. His friends also said some things about him that are quite unfortunate. Whenever he drank, they said, he became "a different person." He did not act like himself. On one occasion, prior to the shooting, he allegedly pointed a gun at someone after having had some alcohol.

There he sat in the courtroom. The judge asked him for his plea to each charge, from murder to attempted murder. "Guilty," he said. The judge, having been prodded by the prosecutor, asked young Sebastian what his intention was when he shot at all three victims. "To kill them," he said. It was difficult to watch. Not because gruesome details were discussed, but because it's hard to see such a young kid, who has probably lived many more good days than he has bad ones, talk about such horrific things. All because of some irrational decision he made in such a short instant. The judge asked him why he did it. "I don't know why," he said. He's been sitting in the Lewis & Clark County Jail for months. How many mornings do you think he has woken up in his cell, wondering if what he did really happened? Oh, no, please tell me I'm not waking up here again. I can't have done that. Did that really happen? Did I really kill that kid? Wasn't it just a dream?

I'm a member of Lewis & Clark County Sheriff's Reserves Class 16. Our most recent class was Evidence Handling and Crime Scene Investigation and Processing. Pictures? Yes. Stories? You bet. The most fascinating comment, however, was not related to a specific story, but to law enforcement work in general. The detective teaching the class said, "If it weren't for booze, we wouldn't have jobs, guys." In the context of what has happened in Sebastian Olivares-Coster's case, and in countless others, alcohol was involved. People really need to stop and think.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

4 Guys Who Nearly Made Me Wet Myself

It can take a lot for a person to intimidate me. Part of it has to do with my size, I think. People generally leave me alone, even in situations where others might not be left alone. Believe it or not, my most dangerous moments thus far in life have come when I was a bouncer at Subway--yes, as in the sandwich shop Subway--on Halloween in Chico, California. I did that gig two years in a row. For those of you who don't know, downtown Chico on Halloween used to be pretty rowdy. All the downtown business snobs slithered away while Chico State students came out to flaunt their costumes. Oh, and they were drunk as skunks. And stupid. It never got too crazy while I was there. I only had to man-handle two guys. But the potential was there.

There's another kind of intimidation. I've worked for people who, in their devotion to the bureaucratic model, have truly lived in silent awe of organization directors and upper management. I've attended meetings with them, and with all kinds of people. I've never been one to feel like I need to sit back and let the big dogs bask in some kind of angelic light that shines only upon the high and mighty. We're all people, after all, and everyone snores, wakes up, showers, drives to work and gets hungry at lunch time. Just because someone gets paid more to do something than I do does not mean he or she is more important than I am. Nor am I more important than the people whose work I manage.

But today, everything changed. I came across some guys who stared me down so hard, so thoroughly that I felt that they could see every part of me. From the time I peed my pants in Mr. Persky's fifth-grade classroom while I waited for the final bell to ring, to the moments when my kids have told me that I'm fat, I felt completely open and exposed. I wanted to apologize to them. I wanted to say: "I'm sorry for being a sissy moron, Sirs. Please don't kick my can around the block." The worst part of it? I did not even meet them in person. They glared at me from the cover of a magazine. Imagine, if you can, the sight of four men so focused, fit and scary that all you can think about is running away before your pants become wet in all the wrong places. Yeah. That was me. Today. I had to put the magazine down and run to the little boys' room.

These guys were bad. Apparently they are the four biggest studs in the American Bowling Association. I've never seen them before. But there they were on the cover of the ABA's magazine with their huge balls. They were trying to look like four prison thugs locked away for something horrible. The four toughest bowlers I have ever seen. In fact, if I ever saw them at a bowling alley, I imagine I would not be able to bowl just then. At least not in the lane next to them. I'd be afraid they might come over and make fun of me. "Hey, pal," they'd say, "nice gutter ball. Why don't you get out of here before we throw our stale bowling alley beer at you." Perhaps one of them would want to arm wrestle me with his strong bowling arm. Or dare me to an eating contest to see how much bowling-alley-snack-bar food I could eat without getting indigestion. I'd be dead in the water.

And worst of all, I bet my wife would be there. Man, how could I compete with that? One look at their bowling shirts, and she'd be like, "Greg, I'm sorry, but those guys are so hot that I don't care which one I go home with to his trailer, as long as one of them will have me." Then I'd be forced to finish my game, bowling gutter ball after gutter ball while my wife was sitting on the lap of Doug, Chet, Dave, or Bob, running her fingers through his Pert Plus hair. They've got to be using Pert Plus. Have you seen how their mullets sway just right as they release their grip on their bowling balls?

And then there's the romanticism of conquering an enemy. We've all seen boxers strut to the center of the ring, only to stare each other down while the referee reviews the rules of the bout. Or the four captains of an NFL team walking deliberately to the middle of the football field like they own the joint. What gives? I'm sorry, but a professional linebacker sprinting in stealth to deliver a monster hit on a running back has nothing on a chubby white guy who rolls a ball at some stationary pins. Nor does the boxer who spends 26 hours a day jumping rope at the speed of nano-light. If I were a professional bowler, I'm sure my mantra would be the same as the one all the others chant as they bend over to heft their huge ball: "OK, pins, don't even think about moving. It's not going to matter. You could slide a millimeter to the right or the left, but I'm going to get you nonetheless."

I know--why don't we set up a staring contest between these guys and the top four chess players in the world? I bet we could sell tickets.

Give me a break. I've seen scarier two-year-olds. I'm sorry, but if you want to be an intimidating sports figure, don't go into bowling.

Friday, November 6, 2009

Wanderlust & The Next C.O.

I listened to the voice of a dead man yesterday at work. His wife, a new widow, called our client helpline to ask some questions. I took the call. She told me she had some questions about a bill she was getting for her late husband. In the health care industry, consumers call helplines to get answers. Sometimes their circumstances are not great. Sometimes they are very fragile. The really hard ones are the moms who have lost newborns and those who have lost spouses.

I needed to research the issue about which she called. I asked her for her phone number and told her I'd get back to her shortly. After getting the information I needed, I dialed her number. The next thing I heard was her husband's voice, explaining that they were not able to take my call, and that if I would leave my name and number, they would get back to me. He sounded happy enough, like a pretty regular guy. I thought about how hard it would be for that man's mother (he was only in his early fifties) or son or neighbor to hear the familiar voice, and how it mocked reality by providing a hollow, bogus return to the recent days when that return call just might come from him. I thought about life and circumstances and fortune. Luck. Dreams. And wishes. And then I remembered something I had learned several years ago about wishing for things to be different.

My first real job out of graduate school was as a trainer for a large county agency in Central California. It was my privilege to work with a chap who was, and remains, wise, funny, caring and very experienced. The Chief (he spent at least 30 years in our beloved U.S. Navy and had retired as a Command Master Chief--never mind his two master's degrees) taught me a valuable lesson during our time together. He talked about C.O.s (commanding officers) he'd had in the service. Some of them were good. Some of them weren't as good. He explained to me that no matter how bad someone thought his C.O. was, it was risky to look forward to the day when that C.O. was to be replaced. The reason? Perhaps the new C.O. would actually be worse than the one who was replaced.

So........life. I can't say just how many times I've wished I had a different job. That whole thought pattern goes all the way back to my days at KFC as a gourmet chef. I think what it has come down to has been a mindset that tends to look at negatives around me rather than positives. I bet there are negatives to most jobs. Just as there are negatives to many places one could live. I have heard it called wanderlust. It's a condition typically found in men. Hey, there's land in .... who knows where for really cheap. Hey, there are lots of government jobs in Wisconsin. Hey, I hear that such and such is a really nice place to live.

Any of this sound familiar? I know that the men in my family are guilty. Guilty! And the women I know--my wife, my mom, my sister, my brother's wife--seem a bit more grounded and less likely to cave to wanderlust. I think men are restless, generally speaking. I've been working on becoming more grounded. More content with things the way they are. That way, I don't spend my life thinking about what another job would be like. What another place of residence would be like. It's not a really productive way to live. Plus you miss out on so much that is happening around you. And like wishing for a new commanding officer, how can it be guaranteed that the new situation will, in fact, be better than what is there already?

I hope that when my bell tolls, when it's my turn to take the big exit, I will have been living a content life instead of having been preoccupied with wanderlust. If my voice is the one someone hears on the voicemail greeting when they call my home after I'm gone, I will sound happy. That's the plan.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Dad as Sucker

Is there anything better than having your presence celebrated? The two-year-old gets pretty excited when I get home from work. This evening she jumped up and down as I walked by her room on my way to mine, announcing, "My daddy's home! Yay! Yeah!"

It doesn't seem too long ago that I looked forward to the hour between 5:00 and 6:00, when my own dad would return home from work. He often came inside the house and went straight to work, either by helping to get dinner ready or by getting started on the dishes.

I don't know what it is about a dad's arrival home from work that can make kids giddy. After all, dads aren't that cool. They're tired. They're cranky. They don't think straight when they first walk in the door. They sometimes smell bad. Dads are famous for telling really stupid jokes. They are also known to get upset about messes and kids who back-talk to their mothers. Dads might leave their socks on the living room floor--accidentally, I'm sure. There are other things, of course, about dads, and our list could go on. Especially if we ask the moms out there for comments.

Sometimes people do things before Dad gets home to effect some kind of mood-changing miracle. For example, a plate of cookies strategically placed so it is seen upon entering the house might make the news of a speeding ticket easier to take. Or maybe Dad will walk through a spruced-up garage, completely oblivious to the fact that his brain is being magically programmed to tell his mouth to say, "Yes," when his son asks for a new pair of shoes. Such Jedi mind tricks are commonplace in homes where dads come home from work day in and day out. Other times it's only for the sake of getting a laugh.

I recall one particular day when I had a stroke of pure, unadulterated genius. Our cat, Sophie, about whose fate I may write at a future time, had killed a mouse. She would not eat it, however. The carcass just lay on the back patio. It had died for Sophie's entertainment. And what's up with cats, anyway? Why do they batter a mouse to death, only to walk away from it? I digress. So there lay the dead mouse. I thought about the mouse. And then it hit me. I decided I had to act. Never before had any opportunity like this been placed before me. It was perfect. And I did not have much time. It would not be long before my dad would be home. I grabbed some string. Scribbled a tiny note. Set everything up.

I watched secretly from inside the back door, waiting for my dad's car to appear in the driveway. I looked over at the garage door, through which he would enter the house. The mouse was positioned perfectly. I grew very excited. I considered the idea that what I had done was twisted and insensitive. I did not care. This was right up my dad's alley. As in a perfect strike. As in I'd be bowling a 300. That's how good this was. So the car appeared. My dad got out. Walked through the garage toward the door. He began to slow as he saw the mouse. It was hanging, by its neck, from the rafter right in front of the door, on a long piece of string. He stopped. Bent a bit to look at the mouse, to read the note tied around its neck. I just can't take it anymore.

The discovery lasted only seconds. It seemed like hours. I felt like a comic trying out a joke for the first time on stage. The second, or two seconds, between punchline and audience reaction must seem eternal. Will they like it? Will he think the mouse is funny? And then payoff. The smile. The laughing. I couldn't hear it. I was standing inside the house. But I could see it. The shoulders moving up and down with laughter. Score one for the mouse. And Sophie.

And so I reckon there will be days when I come home to messes. Days when I come home to some cooked up scheme that will cause me to agree to some crazy kid-request to which I would normally say No. "What's that, son, you want me to buy you a BB gun for, for, for, well, it's not your birthday, now is it? I really want to say, 'No,' son, but these cookies are so good that my brain is telling me that I should say, 'Yes.' I don't know why I'd say, 'Yes,' but I'm going to. You see, I really don't understand it, but I'm going to say, 'Yes.'"

For now, I'll settle for the two-year-old's daily celebration. In fact I'll look forward to it. I'll relish it. I'll deal with the Jedi mind tricks later. Hopefully there will be more funny discoveries than tricks.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Clouds and Wolves

A monster shelf of clouds has been towering over the mountains west of Helena all day. I caught a glimpse of it just minutes ago as the final traces of navy blue sky gave way to black. If there were any real threat within that mass of clouds, I imagine some people around here would be worried. After all, when danger lurks, it's nice to be able to see it. But night has arrived. Day is somewhere else. And I'd be left with nervous speculation for a companion if I believed that those clouds posed any risk.

I think back to the opening events in Jack London's White Fang. During the beginning of the book, London vaults the reader right into a serious struggle (he uses toil or a form of it repeatedly, and it is brilliant use of a verb). Two men are journeying through the frozen, hard north country. Their task is transporting a casket, assisted by their team of sled dogs. A hungry wolf pack begins taking the dogs one by one. Eventually all the men's dogs, and even one of the men, fall prey to the wolves. The second man is rescued, quite literally, at the last possible minute.

What is interesting, however, is how London crafts the pack's presence. Specifically, how the men sense the wolves at night as the pack moves around their camp, just far enough from the glow of the fire to avoid being seen. If you have read the story, then you know full well just how effectively London grabs you and shoves you right into that camp, and how nerve-racking it is to be there. The danger is out there. London's characters know it. Daylight in this part of the book, by virtue of the north's winter season, is scarce. The darkness outside of the fire's glow only serves to amplify the men's fear. Their enemy--the pack--is active, and it is excruciating not to know what the enemy is doing in the darkness.

For various reasons, I've had some discussions with my wife recently about things like danger and safety. I'm the kind of person who wants certainty. I can deal with ambiguity in some areas of my life. In other spaces, however, I want to know what to expect. I want to know what things mean. I want to know why some things I've heard were said, and what I'm supposed to do about them. Some of my questions have turned out to be my nemeses. They have become my wolves. My enemies. And it doesn't matter how mammoth my campfire is, they remain, it seems, just beyond the light. They circle and dance, and when dawn breaks down that firelight wall around the camp, my wolves retreat to the groves of "dark spruce" (to borrow terms from London). They take off to the other side of a nearby hill. But they return with the blackness. They always do.

The good news is that my wolves are quite tame. They do not stop life the way London's wolves did. But there are times when my uncertainties are potent. My wife had some good things to say about those times when I find myself there, listening to the wolves slink around my camp: "You just gotta do whatever you need to do to prepare yourself for whatever might come your way." She's right. And it's right for everyone.

Preparation is the key. It could be learning or training or storing food or loving your kids or any number of things. For London's two men, the key would have been to bring more ammunition. They had a rifle, you see. They had the beginnings of what they needed. But when the wolves started causing problems the men only had three cartridges left. The situation deteriorated quickly. Things clearly would have been far different if they had packed more of what they needed. Many of us have found ourselves situations where we wish we had brought more, or bought more, or studied more, or ventured out into learning something new. My list of those experiences would likely be longer than one page.

Once again, I need to listen to my wife. As I prepare myself in as many ways as I can for whatever may come, my uncertainties will weaken. My wolves will become poodles. And if the looming clouds around Helena ever do pose some kind of threat, I'll be ready.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Dollars and Questions

A dollar really isn't that big of a deal. Sometimes it can seem like it, though. We all seem to have struggles at some point. College. Kids. Furloughs. Kids. Salary reductions. Kids. Layoffs. Unexpected expenses.

I'll never forget one experience I had that was based on a few dollars I had with me. My wife and I had moved from Northern California to the central part of the state. We drove home to Chico fairly regularly. The trip took around four and a half hours. There was a great place to stop about half way through the journey, complete with several gas stations and all of the regular fast food places. During one particular journey, we stopped to fuel up and grab some food at the McDonald's there. That's where I met Billy.

Billy was a scruffy looking guy who approached me in the parking lot. He didn't look too crazy or dirty or scary. He was just a guy who looked tired and down. He asked me if I had any money I could spare. The pivotal moment that so many of us dread. And of course, the thoughts began right away. What are you going to buy? Are you going to go get some beer at that gas station? Do you really need my money? Why don't you go get a job?

We've all been there. Most of us have declined, at some point or another, assisting someone who has asked for help in this manner. It's easy to do. The reasons vary. What if the person waits for me to reach in my pocket and then jumps me while I'm distracted? What if the person is going to just buy some beer with my money? What if the person really has an apartment and is just doing this as an easy way to get money? I've often had these kinds of thoughts over the years. Sometimes I've justified staying my hand. Other times I've liberally shared with the person who asked for money, deciding that it would be on his head--not mine--if he chose to use my money for something like a can of beer or some cigarettes. Occasionally, I've been able to help without judging--just giving money away without thinking about anything more than helping the person. But that's not been the norm for me. Maybe it has been for you, for which you ought to be congratulated. But I need to work on that. I'll admit it. I'm not sure why that's hard. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that that's one way I cope with feeling awkward about a situation.

So there I was, faced with some dude I did not know at all, and he was asking me for money. A thought came to me: I'm going to make him do something for my three dollars. I looked him in the eye and said, "I have three dollars. But you have to answer three questions for me first." He was a bit surprised, I'm sure, by what had to be an odd response to his request. He agreed to my conditions.

My first question was, "What is your name?" "Billy," he said. I do not recall his last name.

My second question: "Where did you grow up?" He told me he grew up in a town near Stockton, California, very close to where we were standing at the time.

Third question: "When you were a kid, what did you want to be when you grew up?" I remember that he seemed to light up a bit with this one. "A professional pitcher," he said. He then told me about a game he pitched in high school, during which he did quite well against the opposing team.

I gave him his three dollars.

What is it about things like that that leave lasting impressions? I'd never had an experience like that prior to that day. I've never had one since (which, I think, is a shame). I'm fairly certain that Billy had rarely, if ever, had someone come up with such a scheme when it came to offering him some help. But there we were. Two former high school baseball players, standing in front of a McDonald's. He'd pitched well against a team in high school. I knew what that was like. He had a name. He'd grown up in a smaller, agricultural community. Same for me.

I think most folks like it when someone takes an interest in them. Who doesn't want to talk about his or her dreams? Who doesn't want to talk about him- or herself? Not in an arrogant manner, but simply by way of sharing experiences and thoughts and feelings. I'm willing to bet that Billy got at least a little kick out of my silliness that day. I got a huge kick out of it. How would I have known I was standing next to someone who pitched a great game in high school? How would I have known that this guy who asked for money had once dreamed of becoming a big-league pitcher?

So who else is out there? What do we know about the people around us? They have names and dreams and stories. I imagine that they all, including you and me, have at least one interesting story to tell. Even in the situations where it might seem unlikely to find significance in another person, as in my experience with Billy, there is something valuable to uncover.

I gave Billy three bucks. Three lousy bucks. And I met someone whom I'm sure I'll never see again. But he is someone I will never forget.

My thanks to Billy.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Goblins and Halloween

There's something about a 2-year-old girl dressed as a ninja. Especially when she does ninja moves. She's dressed in black sweat pants and a black, long-sleeve shirt. She wears an orange headband, and she will kick your butt. With cuteness, that is.

Halloween has taken on a completely different meaning. It used to be a silly time for me to go out and get candy and screw around. Now it's all about how Andrea and I can get the kids into the cutest costumes possible. For example, how can you go wrong with a chicken costume that is exceedingly cute and soft? I've never wanted to grab a chicken and squeeze it close until one of our kids was dressed as one. We've had various animals at Halloween time. A tiger, a chicken, a dog, and I'm sure there have been others.

There's no telling what the kids will want to be for Halloween on any given year. They choose something and it lasts for around 4.5 minutes. Somehow, this year, the kids decided they wanted to be ninjas. I wouldn't have had a clue about how to put those costumes together. Leave that to a bright woman who has a knack for finding stuff that, when put together, works very well. The kids tried their costumes last night. They loved them. They are now professional assassins. Very small, professional candy assassins. If you need to 'take care' of any kind of sweet something or other, I 'know people.'

I have been guilty of being a stick in the mud with certain things. I'm not very good at being excited about every little thing that rolls my way. But I'm glad that I'm able to get into Halloween as much as I do. I don't dress up. But I'm happy to get the kids stuff and take them to our church's annual trunk or treat party. They get a big kick out of it, and it brings plenty of smiles. The consumption of candy at rocket thruster speed and the accompanying candy wrapper mess can be a tad frustrating. But those things end. It's all worth it. It's all good. Kudos to Andrea, who never fails to take Halloween by the horns and make it fun for our goblins (and for herself in the process!). I'm very fortunate to have married someone who gets as excited as a little kid about so many things.

So bring it on. We've got 4 ninjas in our family, and someone who knows ninjas well enough to clothe them. I think we all will just sit back and let the 2-year-old just take care of things. She'll kick your butt.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

The Reverend

When Martin Luther King, Jr., was assassinated, the media grabbed hold of a young man who was at the scene, who actually held King as he died from gunshot wounds on a hotel balcony. At least that's what Jesse Jackson told the media.

When King was shot, Jesse Jackson was nowhere near the balcony where King died. Instead, he was in the parking lot below the balcony. He hid for a while, which is understandable. Most people would want to be away from the dangers of gunfire. But then the TV cameras began appearing. Jesse Jackson was born, in a sense, from between the legs of a camera tripod.

Ken Timmerman, author of Shakedown, a Jackson expose, interviewed the people who were actually with King when he was shot. He spoke with the others who, at the time the shots rang out, were in various places around the hotel. As soon as the TV cameras showed up at the hotel, Jackson told others in the group that they should not talk to the press. What did Jackson do next? He went immediately to Chicago, hired a public relations agent, and did an interview on NBC's Today Show. In a bloody shirt.

He'd been there, you see. He had held King in his arms as he died. The only problem was that it was all a lie. There were other interviews that day. A legend was born. A Chicago power rose quickly, and literally, from nowhere.

That's not where the fun stops. The Reverend Jackson never completed any kind of seminary. No one is sure where the title Reverend came from. He has a college degree--an honorary doctorate--from an institution that bestowed Jackson with the degree after Jesse Jackson, Jr., was appointed to the school's board. Other than a phony title and a bogus degree, Jesse Jackson has no credentials.

And now he surfaces again. This time to decry the violence that has so publicly humiliated the city of Chicago. It's not surprising to see community leaders step forward to rally Chicagoans after the pointless death of a sixteen-year-old kid who was near--not in, but near--a gang fight. How did he show his support for finding an end to the gang violence in Chicago? He rode on a bus with some of the teenagers from the deceased student's school. And he made a statement at a news conference (gee, I wonder who called that news conference?). According to several articles, Jackson said, “This is a state of emergency given patterns of violence and patterns of killing." Surely Jackson knows what he's talking about. After all, no one would use the term pattern if he had not studied such things. Using the term pattern implies a familiarity with the issue.

If I were the father of the boy who died at the hands of some of Chicago's finest young men, I would welcome Jackson's efforts to rally the community. I would also do whatever I could to support him and his attempts to reassure the youth of Chicago that it's OK to stand up for what's right, and that gang violence is a fast track to nowhere-ville. I'd embrace Jackson. So long as he promised there wouldn't be any cameras. Then, and only then, might I believe he was sincere.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Angry Thespians

I have yet to find out to whom George Eliot was referring when he (really a she using a nom de plume) wrote, "He was like the cock who thought the sun had risen to hear him crow." But there are plenty of people in the news media who fit the bill.

I will never forget seeing Katie Couric's appearance on Larry King's show. Larry had lots of questions for Katie. How she felt about her new job as the anchor of CBS's evening newscast. How she felt about being the first female anchor of one of the big three (CBS, NBC, ABC) networks’ nightly newscast. How she planned on signing off (what she would say) at the end of each evening‘s newscast. Very important matters. At least the media was making it out to be important. Therein lies the problem. Anytime the media campaigns to bring attention to the media, it becomes the cock in Eliot’s quote.

The most obvious problem with all of this was that Katie landed the gig far too late in the game. You see, back in the day, there were only three major networks: NBC, ABC, and CBS. Each network offered a nightly newscast. The timing of the newscast was perfect. It was around dinner time, and families were home together (mind you, it was a different world back then). Families welcomed news anchors into their home each day, and relied on them to fill them in on what happened during the day.

I remember watching the news in the evenings. The three networks aired their newscasts at the same time. How was one to choose which network to watch? It came down to whom you liked the best. In my youth, the viewer was faced with choosing Dan Rather (CBS), Tom Brokaw (NBC) or Peter Jennings (ABC). I liked Brokaw. So I watched NBC. (I’m fully aware of the oddity it is for a youngster to watch the news.)

The “so what?” factor that hit so heavily against Couric’s landing the anchor position at one of the big three would have been irrelevant if the 24-hour news outlets had not surfaced with the advent of CNN in 1980. Couric’s biggest challenge was making her new job seem important. It was painfully obvious that it was unimportant because of the fact that CNN and Fox News, not to mention the other 24-hour cable news networks, already had female anchors who had one-hour shows all to themselves. What do you do with a half-hour nightly newscast if you’re CBS’s first female anchor when there is already a Nancy Grace with an entire hour all to herself each evening on Fox News? Or Paula Zahn’s hour-long show on CNN? Suddenly, Couric’s achievement looks like a participation trophy handed out at a Little League banquet.

And how did Couric get the job in the first place? Dan Rather, the quintessentially dramatic news man, decided to retire. The stage was set for an historic transition at CBS. Rather, who had been around CBS news since Moby Dick was a minnow, was retiring from the CBS Evening News, and Couric, who enjoyed monumental popularity on NBC’s The Today Show, was to take Rather’s seat at the storied and legendary news desk. Rather’s retirement was widely advertised and built up. It seemed like a pivotal moment in American history. One of the big three giants was to step down. I did not think I could miss Rather’s final newscast. Even newscasters on other networks were speculating at what Rather would say as he signed off for the final time. I began to wonder myself. What parting words would Dan Rather have for the world?

It turned out that Rather looked stoically into the camera--right into my eyes!--and said, simply, “Courage.” What a let down. And in retrospect, what a joke. What he said was not the joke. Instead, the fact that everyone cared about what he would say was the joke. After all, isn’t the newscaster, or newspaper reporter, simply there to tell the story? Isn’t he or she there to convey facts that have relevance to everyone’s life?

There are far too many people in the media who think that, at the very least, they are the story. The stories they tell are not the story, but they are the story. Or bigger than the stories. They think that people tune in to their shows not to listen to the stories they tell, but to listen to them tell the stories. Big difference.

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Sometimes I need a strong stomach to get through the news. Learning about film director Roman Polanski, who fled the United States just before he was to be sentenced for raping a 13-year-old girl, has been eye-opening. It's been over 20 years since he was convicted of the crime, but what has been said about Polanski, directly and indirectly, over the past 12 years, has been extremely upsetting.

Indirect commentary on whether the crime and subsequent skipping out were acceptable came when Polanski won the Oscar for Best Director for The Pianist in 2003. I'm somewhat confused about the message from Hollywood. The Oscars organization, as well as "the Academy," should have ignored Polanski. Actually, they should have told him to return to the United States to face justice.

Whoopi Goldberg, amazing social commentator that she is, came to Polanski's defense recently, saying that his act was not a serious kind of rape (her words were that it was not 'rape rape'). Martin Scorsese and Woody Allen have come to his defense. Why? Why not tell him that he needs to pay the price for what he did to a 13-year-old girl?

Not all of Hollywood backs Polanski. On Jay Leno's show, Leno blasted him during his monologue. Chris Rock took him to task during his appearance on the same episode of Leno's show. Clearly there are plenty of people in Hollywood who know right from wrong. I'm just amazed that there are people and organizations who have come to his defense. Even those closest to him ought to defend the true victim in this story. As the Proverb says, "Faithful are the wounds of a friend; but the kisses of an enemy are deceitful."